Drawing for TOPTEC

USPTO serial 79007781

TOPTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOPTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary M. Nath

GARY M NATH NATH & ASSOCIATES PLLC1030 15TH ST NW 6TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Abrasives, namely, flexible abrasivesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 1, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance