Drawing for PCB-POOL

USPTO serial 79007791

PCB-POOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3100932Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 6, 2006
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PCB-POOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST STE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical processing, namely, designing and customizing layout programs for the optimization of technical procedure actions in the production of circuit boards [ updating of layout programs for the optimization of technical procedure actions in the production of circuit boards ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 3, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 6, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 4, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 4, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance