Drawing for CDISK

USPTO serial 79007802

CDISK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3120881Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 2006
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CDISK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, syringes for injections and needles for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 21, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 26, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 21, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance