Drawing for SEIREN CONDUCTIVE FABRICS

USPTO serial 79007809

SEIREN CONDUCTIVE FABRICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3135971Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 29, 2006
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEIREN CONDUCTIVE FABRICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip Furgang

PHILIP FURGANG FURGANG & ADWAR, L.L.P.1325 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electromagnetic shielding fabric composed of fabric and metal such as copper, nickel, and copper plus nickel, for use as shielding to prevent electromagnetic emissions from electrical equipment, materials for conducting electricity, namely, electromagnetic shielding fabric composed of fabric and metal such as copper, nickel, and copper plus nickel, for industrial material, namely electrical and electronic devices, including digital products and their parts, computers and their parts, cellular telephones and their parts, copying machines and their parts, upholstery of interior furniture and cars, conductive tapes for conducting electrical charges; electronic apparatus and instruments, parts and fittings therefor, namely, electromagnetic shielding gaskets; fabrics used for removing and discharging electricity and reflection of electromagnetic waves, for use in clothing, electronic goods, curtains, cable coves, shielding tapes, and shielding boothsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 26, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 26, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 29, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2006ISIRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Mar 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 7, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 21, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance