USPTO serial 79007841
MEDIRANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIRANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH & Co. KG
Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH & Co. KG
Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products, namely, Butter, grease, cheese, particularly fresh cheese, melted cheese, soft cheese, pressed cheese, hard cheese, milk curd cheese, cheese preparations, particularly melted cheese preparations, cream, yogurt except as beverage, soft white cheese, entrees consisting primarily of soft white cheese, condensed milk, milk powder for alimentary purposes; margarine | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs KG
- Other trademarks owned by Hofmeister Vermögensverwaltungs KG
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named MEDIRANO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |