Drawing for EXIN

USPTO serial 79007842

EXIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3085623Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK I PEROFF

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPARTRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON, ET AL599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL EXAMINATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY, DEVELOPING STANDARDS FOR EXAMINATIONS, DRAFTING REQUIREMENTS AND TESTS FOR EXAMINATIONS, SELECTING CANDIDATES FOR EXAMINATION, CONDUCTING EXAMINATIONS, AND ASSESSING EXAMINATION RESULTSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 10, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 26, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 25, 2013CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 18, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 20, 2013CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 18, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 18, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2008CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 25, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2007RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 4, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance