Drawing for BERNARD

USPTO serial 79007849

BERNARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3286487Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2007
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERNARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory M. Kratofil, Jr.

GREGORY M KRATOFIL JR POLSINELLI SHALTON WELTE SUELTHAUS PC700 W 47TH ST STE 1000KANSAS CITY, MO 64113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers, non-alcoholic beers and bottled spring waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 24, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 12, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance