Drawing for DIADEMA VILLA L'OLMO 2002

USPTO serial 79007858

DIADEMA VILLA L'OLMO 2002

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3158883Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIADEMA VILLA L'OLMO 2002?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M PERRY SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW & TUTTLE PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 14, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 26, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 4, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 10, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 3, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance