USPTO serial 79007873
LINK PLAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3104135Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2006
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINK PLAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. MODZELESKI
DAVID S MODZELESKI ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital versatile disc (DVD) players; digital video recorders; television sets; computer network adapters, hubs, switches and routers; video cameras; digital cameras; computers; computer peripherals; computer disc drives; computer software, namely, communications software for connecting computer network users, computers search engine software, graphical user interface software, LAN (local area network) operating software and network access server operating software; computer memories; modems; blank optical discs; amplifiers; personal stereos; audio receivers and video receivers; portable telephones; coaxial cables; electrical cables; fiber optic cables; video game cartridges | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |