USPTO serial 79007884
FLAVANGENOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLAVANGENOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. SCOTT ALPRIN
RICHARD LEHV FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; cosmetics; cosmetics containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark; soaps and shampoos containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | Processed foods, namely, soy beans, dried cabbage, fermented cabbage, raisins, and dried prunes, in the form of tablets, granular, powder and liquid mainly containing extractives from pine bark; dietary supplements in powder, granular, hard-capsular, soft-capsular, liquid, paste and tablet form containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Soft drinks; preparations for making soft drinks, namely, concentrates containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark, syrups containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark, powders containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark, and granules containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark; soft drinks containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark; fruit juices containing oligomeric proanthocyanidin extracted from pine bark | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Toyo Shinyaku Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Toyo Shinyaku Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FLAVANGENOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |