Drawing for QUILTMASTER

USPTO serial 79007922

QUILTMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUILTMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Sewing machines, sewing machines with embroidery function, knitting machines, weaving looms, embroidery machines and other textile machines and apparatus; parts and fittings of all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Repair and maintenance of sewing machines, sewing machines with embroidery function, knitting machines, weaving looms, embroidery machines, other textile machines and apparatus and parts and fittings thereofSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 2, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance