Drawing for CAPO D'OPERA

USPTO serial 79007968

CAPO D'OPERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPO D'OPERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods not included in other classes of wood, cork, teed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, bone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl; meersehaurn and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics, namely wardrobes, sideboards, tables, chests of drawers, desks, armchairs, book stands, benches; chairs; desks; footstools; bed frames; furniture parts; living room furniture; bedroom furniture, bathroom furniture not included in other classes, office furniture; ottomans, furniture seats; stools; sofas; armoires, beds, closets, umbrella standsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2007PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
Dec 15, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Dec 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2006PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Aug 3, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance