USPTO serial 79008015
FLEXPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3051185Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEXPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-6921 Kennelbach, AT
A-6921 Kennelbach, AT
A-6921 Kennelbach, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. KELLY
DAVID M. KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Tennis rackets [ and covers therefor ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 15, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |