Drawing for VAT

USPTO serial 79008030

VAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3104136Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 13, 2006
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with VAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

Lawrence E. Abelman ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Automatic vacuum valvesACTIVE—
009Electronic controls for valvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 17, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 19, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 7, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 13, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 23, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2005CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 30, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance