Drawing for VMI

USPTO serial 79008085

VMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3051187Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Food beating machines; grinding machines; industrial robots; machines and machine tools for use in the food processing industry, namely, kneading machines, food mixers, elevators, mixers, crushing machines, hoppers, packaging machines and conveyorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 13, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 13, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 29, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 27, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance