Drawing for MARTELL VS F MARTELL 1715

USPTO serial 79008112

MARTELL VS F MARTELL 1715

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3215918Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARTELL VS F MARTELL 1715?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

Jess M. Collen COLLEN IP, Intellectual Property Law, P.C.80 South Highland AvenueThe Holyoke-Manhattan BuildingOssining, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Potable distilled spirits and liqueursSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 11, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 12, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance