Drawing for CAT-KISSES

USPTO serial 79008129

CAT-KISSES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAT-KISSES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Porringers, feeding troughs and small mangers; utensils for the care and cleaning of animals, namely combs and brushes for animals; toiletry utensils for cats (the aforementioned goods included in this class)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Animal foodstuffs and additives for non-medical use for these foodstuffs; chewing bones for dogs; animal litter, cat litterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 31, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance