USPTO serial 79008130
KE ERIC KAYSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KE ERIC KAYSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, artificial coffee, flours and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, edible ices, honey, treacle syrup, yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices, ices for refreshment, including: "baguette Monge", "gâche Monge", "pain Monge", "baguette Paline" and "rustique Paline", "tarte Monge" | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising, business management, business administration, office functions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological research services in connection with bakery and pastry making and industrial analysis and research services in the fields of design and development of recipes and production processes, legal services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |