Drawing for GRIP ON TM ANTI-SLIP SOLUTION

USPTO serial 79008219

GRIP ON TM ANTI-SLIP SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIP ON TM ANTI-SLIP SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Treatments of materials, namely, applying protective anti-slip coatings to ceramic tile, shower tray and bathtub enamel, granite, marble, concrete, slate stone floorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 28, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance