Drawing for WINENERGY

USPTO serial 79008235

WINENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3181084Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2006
Examiner
MAYS, PAULA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with WINENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

YASUO MURAMATSU

YASUO MURAMATSU MURAMATSU & ASSOCIATES26471 RANCHO PARKWAY S., SUITE BLAKE FOREST, CA 92630UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries and cells, namely secondary batteries, dry cells, wet cells, photovoltaic cells; chargers for electric batteries; electronic circuits, namely integrated circuits, large scale integrated circuits; electric power supplyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 10, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Feb 10, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 30, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 18, 201671AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 18, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 26, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 13, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Nov 13, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 201271AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 12, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 24, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance