Drawing for BLEND BY DR OLIVIER COURTIN

USPTO serial 79008237

BLEND BY DR OLIVIER COURTIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3071231Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 21, 2006
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLEND BY DR OLIVIER COURTIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOAK PARK, IL 60302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic products namely; beauty creams, beauty serums, beauty milks, beauty lotions, tonic lotions, beauty masks, beauty gels, beauty oils, make-up removing milks, make-up removing rinses, toilet soaps, scrubbing and exfoliating products, powders, talcum powders, make-up products, scented products, perfumes, eaux de toilette, eau-de-Cologne, deodorants, hair care products, hair lotions, shampoos, bath and shower products; all the aforesaid goods are prepared and/or tested by a medical doctorSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 21, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 5, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 13, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 10, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 5, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 4, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
May 4, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 11, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 9, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 9, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 17, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance