Drawing for NATURAL HI-FIN 1.7

USPTO serial 79008265

NATURAL HI-FIN 1.7

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3127064Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 8, 2006
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAL HI-FIN 1.7?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY D. LOGAN

ANTHONY D LOGAN VENABLE, CAMPILLO, LOGAN & MEANEY PC1938 E OSBORN RDPHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical lenses, in particular high-index organic lensesSECTION 71 - CANCELLEDโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKENโ€”
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IBโ€”
Apr 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILEDโ€”
Apr 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATIONโ€”
Aug 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IBโ€”
Aug 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATEDโ€”
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATEDโ€”
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71โ€”
Jun 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 24, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IBโ€”
Apr 26, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IBโ€”
Apr 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IBโ€”
Apr 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSEDโ€”
Mar 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IBโ€”
Aug 17, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IBโ€”
Aug 8, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register โ€” the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ยฎ symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 3, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IBโ€”
Aug 3, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IBโ€”
Jul 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Mar 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Mar 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Feb 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Feb 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Feb 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILEDโ€”
Oct 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IBโ€”
May 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”
Mar 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IBโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance