Drawing for HI-FIN 1.7

USPTO serial 79008266

HI-FIN 1.7

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3127065Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 8, 2006
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI-FIN 1.7?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY D. LOGAN

ANTHONY D LOGAN VENABLE, CAMPILLO, LOGAN & MEANEY PC1938 E OSBORN RDPHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical lenses, in particular high index organic lensesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 10, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 26, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 3, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance