Drawing for VALGRANGES

USPTO serial 79008290

VALGRANGES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3079889Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 11, 2006
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALGRANGES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

Timothy D. Pecsenye Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Watches and watch partsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 22, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 3, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 20, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Jun 20, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 12, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 12, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 6, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance