USPTO serial 79008335
ANDREAS MIKKELSEN DESIGN-GROUP-DENMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANDREAS MIKKELSEN DESIGN-GROUP-DENMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Candle holders in precious metals or coated therewith, jewellery, horological and chronometric instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Candle holders (not of precious metal or coated therewith); glassware, porcelain and earthenware | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings; decorations for Christmas trees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |