Drawing for KÉO

USPTO serial 79008346

KÉO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3109474Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 27, 2006
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with KÉO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. MATHEW LOMBARD

G. MATHEW LOMBARD LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLC1245 FARMINGTON AVESTE 1334WEST HARTFORD, CT 06107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Pedals for cycles and bicycles; toe clips for cycles and bicycles; attachments for cycle and bicycle pedals, namely, clipless pedals, automatic pedalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 20, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 27, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 19, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2015NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Jun 27, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 26, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 26, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 20, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance