USPTO serial 79008370
ESTOLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3196921Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2007
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESTOLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawerence E. Abelman
LAWERENC E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | TOILET SEATS, BIDETS, SHOWERS, TOILET BOWLS, HAND SHOWERS, LAVATORY BOWLS, BATHTUBS, SPA BATHS, SHOWER TRAYS, URINALS, AND TOILET TANKS FOR LAVATORIES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |