Drawing for SUNMOVER

USPTO serial 79008387

SUNMOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3051196Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNMOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK HARRISON

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Manual and electronic controls of photovoltaic elements and solar collectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 2, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 26, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 15, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 14, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 9, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 19, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 19, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 15, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 8, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance