Drawing for GLASS & CO

USPTO serial 79008404

GLASS & CO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLASS & CO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers (not of precious metal or coated therewith); unworked or semi-worked glass (except glass used in building); glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes; wine glasses; corkscrewsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 24, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 12, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance