USPTO serial 79008405
YELLOW LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YELLOW LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M Nath
GARY M NATH NATH & ASSOCIATES PLLC112 S W STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Abrasives and polishing preparations, namely, flexible and compact abrasives and flexible and compact polishing preparations; abrasives and polishing preparations in sheet form | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machine parts, namely abrasive rolls, abrasive belts, polishing brushes, abrasive filaments, grinding wheels and grinding blocks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand tools for grinding and polishing; wheels for grinding and polishing by hand, and grinding and polishing blocks, polishing brushes, abrasive rolls, abrasive belts, abrasive filaments and abrasives in sheet form for hand tools for treating surfaces; manually operated clamps for holding flexible abrasives, flexible polishing preparations and non-woven fabrics for treating surfaces | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Non-woven fabrics and non-woven fabrics containing abrasives to be used as abrasives and polishing preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |