USPTO serial 79008443
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Aerosoft GmbH Luftfahrt-Datentechnik
DE
Other trademarks owned by Aerosoft GmbH Luftfahrt-Datentechnik
Aerosoft GmbH Luftfahrt-Datentechnik
DE
Other trademarks owned by Aerosoft GmbH Luftfahrt-Datentechnik
Aerosoft GmbH Luftfahrt-Datentechnik
Büren, DE
Other trademarks owned by Aerosoft GmbH Luftfahrt-Datentechnik
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576-1614United StatesCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |