Drawing for AEROSOFT

USPTO serial 79008443

AEROSOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3079891Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 11, 2006
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AEROSOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT S. BRODER

ROBERT S. BRODER Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576-1614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, and software for electronic data processing for the purpose of flight or train simulatingACTIVE—
041[ Training of pilots or train engineers in the form of simulation and relating to aviation ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 20, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 18, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 28, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 9, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 9, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 9, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 9, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 28, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 14, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 12, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 12, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance