Drawing for HYDROPLUS

USPTO serial 79008469

HYDROPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDROPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001FertilizersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 14, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 10, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 10, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 25, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance