Drawing for BROCARD

USPTO serial 79008490

BROCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3114437Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 11, 2006
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BROCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Bochner

Andrew D. Bochner Bochner PLLC1040 Avenue of the Americas15th FloorNew York, NY 10018

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine [ , aperitifs, and eau-de-vie ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 5, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 4, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 14, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 18, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 18, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 11, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 1, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance