Drawing for LES SABLÉS D'OBERFLEX

USPTO serial 79008491

LES SABLÉS D'OBERFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3085636Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LES SABLÉS D'OBERFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

JAY H. BEGLER Nixon Peabody LLP401 Ninth Street, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Wood panels, namely wooden door panels, wood panelling; Wooden wall and floor coverings, namely wood wall panelling, wooden wall panels.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020FurnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 2, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance