Drawing for TRIFLEX

USPTO serial 79008538

TRIFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174264Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Walter F. Fasse

Walter F. Fasse Fasse Patent Attorneys, P.A.PO Box 726Hampden, ME 04444-0726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022STUFFING MATERIALS OF NATURAL FIBERS WHICH ARE REINFORCED BY SYNTHETIC MATERIAL USED BY MATTRESS MAKERS, ELASTIC WOOL FLEECES MADE COMPACT USING ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS FOR MAKING MATS, LAYERS FOR CARPETS AND PADDING MATERIALS FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOBILES AND ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT SECTORSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 17, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 2, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 21, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 2, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance