Drawing for GATEDEFENDER

USPTO serial 79008567

GATEDEFENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3066187Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GATEDEFENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Britt L. Anderson

Britt L. Anderson Perkins Coie LLP3150 Porter Dr.Palo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment, namely, hardware which acts as a protection for an Internet gateway by blocking viruses, spams and other undesirable content, and computers; computer programs for content filtering, for blocking potentially dangerous unknown viruses and worms, anti-spam protection, web filtering by category to prevent access to undesirable content, real-time system monitoring of all network traffic and system activity; computer programs, namely, electronically downloadable software for content filtering, for blocking potentially dangerous unknown viruses and worms, anti-spam protection, web filtering by category to prevent access to undesirable content, real-time system monitoring of all network traffic and system activity; anti-virus software and hardware; antimalware computer programs; antimalware software and hardwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 7, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 9, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 4, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 1, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 30, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 30, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 3, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 3, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance