Drawing for LUCKY FOODS

USPTO serial 79008571

LUCKY FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCKY FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry, venison; meat products made from pork; meat extracts; gelatine for food; soups, clear soups; frozen, dried, boiled and conserved fruits and vegetables; fruit chips, potato chips; bouillon concentrates, broth concentratesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago; flour, corn products (except corn oil), breakfast cereals, bread; confectionery and sweets (candy), ice-cream; honey, syrup; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces, condiments; macaroniSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds; fresh peas and mushrooms; coconuts; plants, flowers; foodstuffs for animals; malt; maize; mussels (live)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 22, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance