USPTO serial 79008600
LITENET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITENET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC LIGHT DIMMERS, ELECTRIC LIGHT SWITCHES AND ACCESSORIES FOR LIGHTING FIXTURES, NAMELY, PLASTIC POLE WITH ELECTRICAL SOURCE IN PROTECTIVE COVER AND LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES FOR USE IN BUILDINGS; ELECTRIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR HEATING, COOLING AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT; FLASHING SAFETY LIGHTS FOR SURVEILLANCE AND SAFETY; ELECTRONIC TRANSFORMERS, BALLASTS AND STARTERS FOR GLOW-CHARGE LAMPS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | ELECTRIC LIGHT BULBS; ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | PLANNING OF LIGHTING INSTALLATIONS FOR BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS FOR BUILDINGS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Luxmate Controls GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Zumtobel Lighting GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Zumtobel Staff GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LITENET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |