Drawing for SEED FORUM INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 79008626

SEED FORUM INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3133229Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEED FORUM INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE

CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 NORTH FAIRFAX STREETSUITE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management assistance and consultation, professional business consultancy, relocation services for businesses, commercial or industrial management assistance, advisory services for business managementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
036Financial analysis, capital investment consultation, financial consultancy, rental of officesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Arranging and conducting of conferences, congresses, seminars, symposiums and workshops in the field of business and finance; organization of education or entertainment competitions in the field of business and finance; educational services, namely, classes and workshops in the field of business and financeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 3, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 20, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 17, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance