Drawing for DENIM DE VILLE

USPTO serial 79008650

DENIM DE VILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENIM DE VILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Goods of silver and its alloys, namely, figurines, candelabras, and busts; tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; smokers articles of precious metal, namely, ashtrays and cases for tobacco, cigarettes and cigars; kitchen or household utensils of precious metal, namely, tea and coffee services of precious metal, salad bowls of precious metal, household containers of precious metal, and dishes of precious metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk; animal skins and hides; trunks and suitcases; purses, satchels; business card cases; vanity cases sold empty; briefcases, haversacks, traveling bags, handbags, garment bags for travel, suitcases and luggage, pocket cases of leather or imitation leather, leather shoulder straps, key cases, coin holders, harnesses, wallets, attaché cases, parasols, umbrellas and walking sticksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Full line of clothing; gloves; belts; shoes; headwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance