USPTO serial 79008663
SUN TRAINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3177202Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUN TRAINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BROOKS R BRUNEAU
BROOKS R BRUNEAU MATHEW, SHEPHERD, MCKAY & BRUNEAU PA100 THANET CIR STE 306PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations, laundry detergent and laundry bleach for laundry use; skin soaps; essential oils for personal use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |