Drawing for DONG PENG

USPTO serial 79008694

DONG PENG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3133232Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DONG PENG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman, Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lavatories; tub control valves, shower control valves, traps, spouts; showers; bidets; bath tubs for sitz baths; toilet bowlsACTIVE—
019Ceramic tiles for buildingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 29, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 9, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 9, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 27, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 30, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Aug 30, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 30, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 20, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 17, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance