Drawing for ALTOOLS UTILITY

USPTO serial 79008706

ALTOOLS UTILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALTOOLS UTILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Park

MCKENNA, LONG & ALDRIDGE LLPANDREW J PARK1900 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer programSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 9, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 21, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance