Drawing for MONTMARTRE

USPTO serial 79008738

MONTMARTRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3117326Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2006
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MONTMARTRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH SOFER, ESQ.

JOSEPH SOFER, ESQ. IPSILON USA, LLP110 W 40th StreetSuite 2001NEW YORK, NY 10018

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely distilled liqueurs and distilled alcoholic digestif, particularly brandy and those originating from the Charente vineyards, namely, cognacACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 3, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 8, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jun 27, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 27, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 23, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 23, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 23, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance