Drawing for LABORATOIRE KOCH

USPTO serial 79008745

LABORATOIRE KOCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LABORATOIRE KOCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Pharmaceutical and parapharmaceutical products, hygienic products for medical use; substances for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings, material for stopping teeth and dental wax, disinfectants; fungicides; herbicidesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Hygienic and beauty care for human beingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 5, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance