USPTO serial 79008761
SPRINGFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3209301Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPRINGFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Swedo
Keith Swedo Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP10 W. Market St.Suite 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's ready-to-wear clothing, namely, pants, shirts, jackets, sweaters, suits, shorts, dresses; non-orthopedic footwear and headwear | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUIRAL, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by QUIRAL, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CORTEFIEL, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TENDAM RETAIL, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SPRINGFIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |