Drawing for TRAFFIC ANALYSER

USPTO serial 79008823

TRAFFIC ANALYSER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAFFIC ANALYSER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment and computers; software (recorded programs); computer peripheral devices, namely hardware and software for data flow auditing and management on electronic communications networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
038Communications by computer terminals or via fibre-optic networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Evaluations, assessments and research in the fields of science and technology provided by engineers; design, development, installation, updating and maintenance of softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 7, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 5, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 15, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 24, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 15, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 12, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance