Drawing for GUMMY WATCH

USPTO serial 79008898

GUMMY WATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUMMY WATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes; jewellery, precious stones; horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Games and playthings; gymnastic and sporting articles not included in other classes; decorations for Christmas trees, playing cardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 3, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 12, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 4, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance