Drawing for THE SUGAR SHOP

USPTO serial 79008907

THE SUGAR SHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3083025Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SUGAR SHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig A. Fieschko

CRAIG A. FIESCHKO DEWITT ROSS & STEVENS S.C.2 EAST MIFFLIN STREET6TH FLOORMADISON, WI 53703-2865

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toiletriesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044[ Face and body hair removal by the sugaring method; beauty salon services; hairdressing ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 18, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 15, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 26, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance