Drawing for DYNASTART

USPTO serial 79008920

DYNASTART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNASTART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical product namely Dynastart, alcoolic fermentation activator used in wine productionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 29, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance